By
Genetic mutations are changes or variations in an organism’s DNA sequence, which can have a range of effects on its traits and characteristics. Some mutations can have a positive impact, such as those that provide resistance to diseases, while others can be harmful, causing genetic disorders or increasing the risk of certain diseases.
The male reproductive system is a hotspot for the emergence of new genes, which may explain why more new mutations are passed down from fathers rather than mothers. However, the reason why older fathers tend to pass on more mutations than younger ones has remained unclear. A recent study in Nature Ecology & Evolution by scientists from Rockefeller University sheds light on why older male fruit flies are more likely to transmit mutations to their offspring. This research could provide insight into the risk of inherited diseases in humans.
Researchers in Li Zhao‘s lab studied mutations that occur during the production of sperm from germline cells, known as spermatogenesis. They found that mutations are common in the testes of both young and old fruit flies, but more abundant in older flies from the outset. Moreover, many of these mutations seem to be removed in younger fruit flies during spermatogenesis by the body’s genomic repair mechanisms—but they fail to be fixed in the testes of older flies.
“We were trying to test whether the older germline is less efficient at mutation repair, or whether the older germline just starts out more mutated,” says first author Evan Witt, a former graduate student in the lab and now a computational biologist at Biomarin Pharmaceuticals. “Our results indicate that it’s actually both. At every stage of spermatogenesis, there are more mutations per
RNA sequencing data from fruit fly testes showing the marked difference between older sperm-related cells (teal, at left) and younger ones (pink, at right). Credit: Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics
Self-care at the genetic level
Genomes keep themselves tidy using a handful of repair mechanisms. When it comes to testes, they have to work overtime; testes have the highest rate of gene expression of any organ. Moreover, genes that are highly expressed in spermatogenesis tend to have fewer mutations than those that are not. This sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: One theory to explain why the testes express so many genes holds that it might be a sort of genomic surveillance mechanism—a way to reveal, and then weed out, problematic mutations.
But when it comes to older sperm, the researchers found, the weed-whacker apparently sputters out. Previous research suggests that a faulty transcription-coupled repair mechanism, which only fixes transcribed genes, could be to blame.
Inherited or new mutations?
To get these results, scientists in the Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics did single-cell sequencing on the RNA from the testes of about 300 fruit flies, roughly half of them young (48 hours old) and half old (25 days old), advancing a line of inquiry they began in 2019. In order to understand whether the mutations they detected were somatic, or inherited from the flies’ parents, or de novo—arising in the individual fly’s germline—they then sequenced the genome of each fly. They were able to document that each mutation was a true original. “We can directly say this mutation was not present in the
Because fruit flies have a high reproductive rate, investigating their mutation patterns can offer new insights into the effect of new mutations in human health and evolution, says Zhao.
Witt adds, “It’s largely unknown whether a more mutated male germline is more or less fertile than a less mutated one. There’s not been very much research on it except for at a population level. And if people inherit more mutations from aging fathers, that increases the odds of de novo genetic disorders or certain types of cancers.”
Reference: “Transcriptional and mutational signatures of the Drosophila ageing germline” by Evan Witt, Christopher B. Langer, Nicolas Svetec, and Li Zhao, 12 January 2023, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01958-x
